Respiratory Rehabilitation Programs in Portugal: Rapid Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/ri2025117Keywords:
Respiratory Diseases, Respiratory Rehabilitation, Respiratory Rehabilitation ServicesAbstract
Introduction: Respiratory rehabilitation is an essential intervention in the management of respiratory diseases, focusing on physical symptoms and psychological aspects that pharmacological therapy alone cannot resolve. The aim of this review was to map the existing evidence on respiratory rehabilitation programs implemented in Portugal.
Method: A rapid literature review was carried out, following the recommendations of Cochrane Rapid Reviews, PICoS strategy and PRISMA guidelines. Evidence was sought regarding the implementation of programs, services offered and user needs. The search included EBSCOHost and B-on databases, with study selection by two independent reviewers.
Results: Twelve articles were included, presenting a high level of evidence and medium to high methodological quality. Inductive thematic analysis revealed central topics: program organization, accessibility, transition pathways, benefits, structures, management, and user perspectives.
Conclusion: Several variables influence the success of programs, such as high costs, geographic inequalities, insufficient supply and limited capacity of the hospital network. Alternatives such as home-based programs, telerehabilitation and community initiatives show promise for expanding access to and effectiveness of respiratory rehabilitation. These findings suggest that the integration of innovative approaches can contribute to overcoming current limitations, promoting improvements in patients' quality of life. Future studies should confirm evidence.
Keywords: Respiratory Diseases; Respiratory Rehablitation; Respiratory Rehabilitation Services.
References
1. Guia Prático Reabilitação Respiratória. Guia de Prestação de Cuidados: O essencial sobre reabilitação respiratória para ajudar as pessoas com dispneia a respirar melhor, a sentirem-se bem e a fazer mais! 2019 [cited 2025 Mar 10]. Available from: https://www.gresp.pt/guiapratico-reabilitacao-respiratoria
2. Direção Geral de Saúde. Orientação 014/2019 - Programas de Reabilitação Respiratória nos Cuidados de Saúde Primários. 2019[cited 2025 Mar 10]. Available from: https://www.dgs.pt/directrizes-da-dgs/orientacoes-e-circularesinformativas/orientacao-n-0142019-de-070820191.aspx;
3. Santos AC. Observatório nacional das Doenças Respiratórias; 2018. [cited 2025 Mar 10]. Available from: https://www.ondr.pt/files/relatório ONDR 2018.pdf.
4. Chung C, Lee JW, Lee SW, Jo MW. Clinical efficacy of mobile app–based, self-directed pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2024 Jan 4;12(1):e41753. https://doi.org/10.2196/41753
5. Silva L, Tiago Maricoto, Mota Â, Lemos L, Santos M, Cunha H, et al. Effectiveness of a home-based pulmonary rehabilitation maintenance programme: the Rehab2Life study protocol. BMC nurs. 2024 May 21;23(1),338. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-01999-6
6. Sousa L, Firmino C, Marques-Vieira C, Severino S, Pestana H. Revisões da Literatura Científica: Tipos, Métodos e Aplicações em Enfermagem. Revista Portuguesa de Enfermagem de Reabilitação [Internet]. Junho de 2018;45–54. Disponível em: https://rper.aper.pt/index.php/rper/article/view/2018.
7. Garritty C, Hamel C, Trivella M, Gartlehner G, Nussbaumer-Streit B, Devane D, et al. Recomendações atualizadas para a orientação dos métodos de revisão rápida da Cochrane para revisões rápidas de eficácia. BMJ [Internet]. 2024;384(e076335). Disponível em: https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/384/bmj-2023-076335. completo.pd
8. Joanna Briggs Institute. Critical Appraisal Tools [Internet]. JBI. 2020[cited 2025 mar 15]. Available from: https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools
Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation / Rehabilitación Interdisciplinaria. 2025; 5:117 12
9. Munn Z, Stone J, Aromataris E, Klugar M, Sears K, Leonardi-Bee J, et al. Assessing the risk of bias of quantitative analytical studies: introducing the vision for critical appraisal within JBI systematic reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Mar 1;21(3):467-471 https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-22-00224
10. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Moher D. Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jun 1;134:103-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.003
11. Institute Joanna Briggs. JBI Levels of Evidence. Institute Joanna Briggs; 2013 [cited 2025 Mar 9]. Available from: http://www.joannabriggs.edu.au
12. Camp S, Legge T. Simulation as a tool for clinical remediation: An integrative review. Clin Simul Nurs. 2018 Mar 1;16:48-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2017.11.003
13. Reis N, Dias MJ, Sousa L, Agostinho I, Ricco MT, Henriques MA, Baixinho CL. Telerehabilitation in the transitional care of patients with sequelae associated with COVID-19: perception of Portuguese nurses. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022 Dec 19;19(24):17096. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192417096
14. Almeida R, Lima ME, Rodrigues L, Silva S, Tavares M. Pediatric respiratory rehabilitation project in a home setting: an innovative alternative to no care. Rev. Mill [Internet]. 2023Jan.31 [cited 2025Mar.9];2(20):e27496. https://doi.org/10.29352/mill0220.27496
15. Gaspar L, Ferreira D, Vieira F, Machado P, Padilha M. O treino de exercício em pessoas com doença respiratória crónica estabilizada : uma Scoping Review. Rev Port Enferm Reabil [Internet]. 2019 Jun 28 [cited 2025Mar.9];2(1):59–65. https://doi.org/10.33194/rper.2019.v2.n1.08.4567
16. Moreira J, Fonseca P, Miguel S. A pilot study on a nurse rehabilitation program: Could it be applied to COVID-19 patients?. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022 Nov 2;19(21):14365. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114365
17. Ribeiro C, Vieira AL, Pamplona P, Drummond M, Seabra B, Ferreira D, Liberato H, Carreiro A, Vicente I, Castro L, Costa P. Current practices in home mechanical ventilation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a real-life cross-sectional multicentric study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 Jul 29:2217-26. https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S314826
18. Santos CD, das Neves RC, Ribeiro RM, Caneiras C, Rodrigues F, Spruit MA, Bárbara C. Novel input for designing Patient-Tailored pulmonary rehabilitation: Telemonitoring physical activity as a vital Sign—SMARTREAB study. J. Clin. Med. 2020 Jul 31;9(8):2450. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082450
19. Souto-Miranda S, Dias C, Jácome C, Melo E, Marques A. Long-Term Maintenance Strategies after Pulmonary Rehabilitation: Perspectives of People with Chronic Respiratory Diseases, Informal Carers, and Healthcare Professionals. Healthcare. 2022 Jan 7;10(1):119. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10010119
20. Vilarinho R, Serra L, Coxo R, Carvalho J, Esteves C, Montes AM, Caneiras C. Effects of a Home-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in GOLD B Group: A Pilot Study. Healthcare. 2021 May 4;9(5):538. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9050538
21. Marques A, Souto-Miranda S, Dias C, Melo E, Jácome C. Access, access, access: the Three A’s of pulmonary rehabilitation–perspectives of patients, loved ones and healthcare professionals. ERJ Open Res. 2022 May 3;8(2): 00705-2021. https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00705-2021
22. Souto-Miranda S, Marques A. Triangulated perspectives on outcomes of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD: a qualitative study to inform a core outcome set. Clin Rehabil. 2019 Apr;33(4):805-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/026921551882140
23. Marques A, Pinho C, De Francesco S, Martins P, Neves J, Oliveira A. A randomized controlled trial of respiratory physiotherapy in lower respiratory tract infections. Respir. Med. 2020 Feb 1;162:105861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2019.105861
https://doi.org/10.56294/ri2025117
13 Ferreira A, et al
https://doi.org/10.56294/ri2025117
24. Pedrosa R, Ferreira Ó, Baixinho CL. Rehabilitation Nurse’s Perspective on Transitional Care: An Online Focus Group. J Pers Med. 2022 Apr 5;12(4):582. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12040582
25. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006 Dec;3(2):77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
26. Jácome C, Marques A, Oliveira A, Rodrigues LV, Sanches I. Pulmonary telerehabilitation: An international call for action. Pulmonology. 2020 Jun 24;26(6):335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pulmoe.2020.05.018
27. Guerra-Paiva S, Dias F, Costaa D, Santos V, Santos C. DPO2 Project: telehealth to enhance the social role of physical activity in people living with COPD. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2021 Jan 1;181:869-75. . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.241
28. Sampaio M. Reabilitação respiratória: a abordagem holística da pessoa com DPOC. Rev Port Med Geral Fam. 2019;35(2):151-4. https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v35i2.12013
29. Pinto D, Spencer L, Pereira S, Machado P, Sousa P, Padilha M. Maintaining Effects of Pulmonary Rehabilitation at Home in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Literature Review. Home. Health. Care. Manag. Pract. 2021 Aug;33(3):226-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1084822321990
30. Ordem dos Enfermeiros. Padrões de Qualidade dos Cuidados Especializados em Enfermagem de Reabilitação. Lisboa, Portugal: Ordem dos Enfermeiros; 2018[cited 2025 Mar 10]. Available from: https://www.ordemenfermeiros.pt/media/8192/ponto-4_regulamento-dos-padr%C3%B5esqualidade-ceer-1.pdf
31. Caneiras C, Jácome C, Sagrario Mayoralas-Alises, José Ramon-Calvo, Fonseca JA, Diaz-Lobato S, et al. Patient experience with home respiratory therapies in Portugal: it is time to move forward. Pulmonology. 2019 Sep 27;25(6):311–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pulmoe.2019.08.003
32. Portugal. Ministério da Saúde. Direção-Geral da Saúde. Programa Nacional para as Doenças Respiratórias 2017 Lisboa: Direção-Geral da Saúde, 2017[cited 2025 Mar 10]. Available from: http://gard-cplp.ihmt.unl.pt/Documentos/Paises/Portugal/Programa_nacional_para_as_doencas_respiratorias-2017_20.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Adélia Ferreira, Carla Vigia, Rogério Ferreira, Sandy Severino, Nelson Guerra, Helena José, Luís Sousa (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
