Nurse interventions in the rehabilitation of adults with neurogenic bowel after spinal cord injury: Rapid Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/ri2025115Keywords:
Neurogenic Bowel, Nursing Care, Rehabilitation, Spinal Cord InjuriesAbstract
Introduction: Neurogenic bowel is a complex condition that affects adults with spinal cord injury, requiring multiple interventions to optimize bowel function.
Objective: This review aims to identify the main nursing interventions in the rehabilitation of people with spinal cord injury who present a neurogenic bowel.
Methods: A rapid literature review based on the Cochrane guidelines was carried out by searching databases on the EBSCO Host and PubMed platforms. Articles in English, published between 2018 and 2024, with free access and addressing nursing interventions for the management of neurogenic bowel were included.
Results: Narrative synthesis was carried out using thematic analysis to analyze the 7 articles included in the review. The following nursing interventions were found: digital rectal stimulation, abdominal massage, electrical rectal stimulation, diet management, stimulation of the gastro-colic reflex, muscular exercise and follow-up.
Conclusions: Digital and electrical rectal stimulation were the most widely used, while dietary strategies proved important, but without standardized guidelines. Innovative technologies have shown promise, but accessibility can be a challenge. In addition, there is a significant gap in the literature on nursing interventions, as well as great heterogeneity in the studies analyzed. The combination of interventions has been shown to be effective in bowel management in adults with neurogenic bowel, post spinal cord injury. However, the lack of solid scientific evidence reinforces the need for more studies to validate the best nursing practices in this area.
References
1. Ordem dos Enfermeiros. Guia de boa prática de cuidados de enfermagem à pessoa com traumatismo vértebro-medular. Lisboa; 2009. (I).
2. Machado D, Assis G. Intestinal pattern and control measures adopted by patients with spinal cord trauma. ESTIMA, Braz J Enterostomal Ther [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2025 Jan 4]. Available from: https://www.revistaestima.com.br/index.php/estima/article/view/468/pdf
3. Rocha C, Redol F. Intervenção de Enfermagem com a Pessoa com Alterações da Eliminação Vesical e Intestinal. In: Cuidados de Enfermagem de Reabilitação à Pessoa ao Longo da Vida. Loures: Lusodidacta; 2023: 271–9.
4. Rodriguez G, Muter P, Inglese G, Goldstine JV, Neil N. Evolving evidence supporting use of rectal irrigation in the management of bowel dysfunction: an integrative literature review. J. Wound Ostomy Cont. Nurs. [Internet]. 2021 Nov [cited 2025 Jan 4];48(6):553–9. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/10.1097/WON.0000000000000816
5. Johns J, Krogh K, Rodriguez GM, Eng J, Haller E, Heinen M, et al. Management of neurogenic bowel dysfunction in adults after spinal cord injury: clinical practice guideline for health care providers. J Spinal Cord Med. [Internet]. 2021 May 4 [cited 2025 Jan 4];44(3):442–510. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10790268.2021.1883385
6. Garritty C, Gartlehner G, Nussbaumer-Streit B, King VJ, Hamel C, Kamel C, et al. Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews. J. Clin. Epidemiol. [Internet]. 2021 Feb [cited 2024 Dec 16];130:13–22. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S089543562031146X
7. Sousa L, Marques J, Firmino C, Frade F, Valentim O, Antunes A. Modelos de Formulação da Questão de Investigação na Prática Baseada na Evidência. Revista Investigação em Enfermagem [Internet]. 2018;31–9. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325699143_MODELOS_DE_FORMULACAO_DA_QUESTAO_DE_INVESTIGACAO_NA_PRATICA_BASEADA_NA_EVIDENCIA
8. Schoeller SD, Martins MM, Ribeiro I, Gomes B, Souza Lima DK, Padilha MI. Breve panorama mundial da Enfermagem de Reabilitação. Rev Port Enferm Reabil [Internet]. 2018 Jun 23 [cited 2024 Nov 22];1(1):6–12. Available from: https://rper.aper.pt/index.php/rper/article/view/11
9. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev [Internet]. 2016 Dec [cited 2024 Dec 16];5(1):210. Available from: http://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
10. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ [Internet]. 2021 Mar 29 [cited 2024 Dec 16];n71. Available from: https://www.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmj.n71
11. Sousa L, Tomás M, Santos MJ, Pereira F, Oliveira C, José H. Art therapy in people living with dementia. Servir [Internet]. 2024 Oct 15 [cited 2024 Dec 16]; 2(10):e34648.. Available from: https://revistas.rcaap.pt/servir/article/view/34648
12. Canto GDL. Risco de Viés em Revisões Sistemáticas: Guia Prático. Florianópolis, SC: Graziela De Luca Canto; 2021.
13. Aromataris E, Lockwood C, Porritt K, Pilla B, Jordan Z, editores. Jbi manual for evidence synthesis [Internet]. JBI; 2024 [cited 2024 Dec 16]. Available from: https://jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL
14. Černe Kolarič J, Plemenitaš Ilješ A, Kraner D, Gönc V, Lorber M, Mlinar Reljić N, et al. Long-term impact of community psychiatric care on quality of life amongst people living with schizophrenia: a systematic review. Healthcare [Internet]. 2024 Sep 2 [cited 2024 Dec 16];12(17):1750. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/12/17/1750
15. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol [Internet]. 2006 Jan [cited 2024 Dec 16];3(2):77–101. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
16. Costa AP, Moreira A, Sá P. Reflexões em torno de Metodologias de Investigação: análise de dados [Internet]. UA Editora; 2021 [cited 2024 Dec 16]. Available from: https://ria.ua.pt/handle/10773/30773
17. Dias EG, Mishima SM. Análise temática de dados qualitativos: uma proposta prática para efetivação. Sustinere [Internet]. 2023 Jul 12 [cited 2024 Dec 16];11(1). Available from: https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/sustinere/article/view/71828
18. Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, Moules NJ. Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int. J. Qual. Methods [Internet]. 2017 Dec 1 [cited 2024 Dec 16];16(1):1609406917733847. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1609406917733847
19. Toma T, Barreto Jorge, Lewin S. GRADE-CERQual: uma abordagem para avaliar a confiança nos resultados de sínteses de evidências qualitativas. In: Temas em Saúde Coletiva. São Paulo; 2019. p. 11–197.
20. Ramos AA, Martins Gomes De Oliveira T, Da Silva AL, Martins G, Kamada I, Ribeiro Cunha R, et al. Nursing interventions for patients with neurogenic bowel dysfunction arising from complete spinal cord injury: a scoping review. J. Wound Ostomy Cont. Nurs. [Internet]. 2023 Jul [cited 2025 Jan 4];50(4):319–25. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/10.1097/WON.0000000000000998
21. Pires JM, Ferreira AM, Rocha F, Andrade LG, Campos I, Margalho P, et al. Assessment of neurogenic bowel dysfunction impact after spinal cord injury using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med [Internet]. 2019 Jan [cited 2025 Jan 4];54(6). Available from: https://www.minervamedica.it/index2.php?show=R33Y2018N06A0873
22. Yeung HY, Iyer P, Pryor J, Nicholson M. Dietary management of neurogenic bowel in adults with spinal cord injury: an integrative review of literature. Disabil Rehabil [Internet]. 2021 Apr 24 [cited 2025 Jan 4];43(9):1208–19. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09638288.2019.1652702
23. Nelson MES, Orr M. Digital rectal stimulation as an intervention in persons with spinal cord injury and upper motor neuron neurogenic bowel. An evidenced-based systematic review of the literature. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine [Internet]. 2021 Jul 4 [cited 2025 Jan 4];44(4):525–32. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10790268.2019.1696077
24. Colasante C, Brose SW, Gustafson K, Bourbeau D. Minimally invasive electrical rectal stimulation promotes bowel emptying in an individual with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med [Internet]. 2023 Nov 2 [cited 2025 Jan 4];46(6):975–9. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10790268.2023.2212335
25. Emmanuel A, Kurze I, Krogh K, Ferreiro Velasco ME, Christensen P, Del Popolo G, et al. An open prospective study on the efficacy of Navina Smart, an electronic system for transanal irrigation, in neurogenic bowel dysfunction. PLoS ONE [Internet]. 2021 Jan 29 [cited 2025 Jan 4];16(1):e0245453. Available from: https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245453
26. Zhang Y, Xia X, Zhuang X. Effect of quantitative assessment‐based nursing intervention on the bowel function and life quality of patients with neurogenic bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury. J Clin Nurs [Internet].2018 Mar [cited 2025 Jan 4]; 27(5–6). Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocn.14198.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Beatriz Novo, Márcia Ribeiro , Mariana Bação , Sandy Severino, Isabel Rabiais, João Tomás , Geyslane Albuquerque, Luís Sousa (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
